By Mark Olsen, Managing Director at PlanPILOT
Managing a retirement plan demands attention to detail, foresight, and unwavering commitment. Financial advisors and plan sponsors bear the weight of managing funds that represent not only a lifetime of savings for many participants but also their aspirations for a comfortable retirement. While the financial landscape continually shifts and new best practices are developed, it’s possible for certain lapses in oversight to occur and impact the integrity of a retirement plan, especially as it relates to investments.
In my three decades of experience, I’ve seen a number of mistakes with retirement plans. Sometimes even seasoned plan sponsors fall for certain investment pitfalls. As we delve deeper, we’ll highlight three specific mistakes in the realm of investments that, while they might appear minor at first glance, can result in considerable financial and legal consequences over time. Addressing these errors is essential. In doing so, plan sponsors not only elevate the prospects of their participants but also underscore their commitment to diligence, transparency, and proficient investment management.
1. Not Documenting and Benchmarking Your Plan’s Specific TDF (Target-Date Fund) Funds
Benchmarking your plan’s specific target-date funds (TDFs) is crucial for myriad reasons, with cost savings being one of the most significant. By failing to benchmark, plan sponsors might be inadvertently sidelining better-performing funds that come with lower fees. This direct oversight could mean participants’ retirement savings aren’t growing at their full potential, making it harder for them to realize their retirement goals. The fees specific to target date funds has been central in the fiduciary lawsuits.
Furthermore, transparency becomes an issue when decisions about fund selection aren’t documented. Participants, auditors, and stakeholders might be left in the dark about why certain TDFs were chosen over others.
Beyond the lack of clarity, there’s also the looming risk of fiduciary breach. As a fiduciary, we want to act in the best interest of participants. Yet without proper benchmarking and clear documentation, proving this fiduciary prudence becomes challenging and can lead to unnecessary complications down the road.
2. Not Updating (or Not Even Creating) an IPS (Investment Policy Statement)
An investment policy statement (IPS) is the backbone of a retirement plan’s investment strategy. Without a systematic process for reviewing and selecting investments, inconsistencies and haphazard decisions can creep in. A clear, updated IPS not only provides a road map for making sound investment decisions but also shields plan sponsors from potential legal ramifications by demonstrating due diligence and prudent decision-making, verifying they’re meeting their fiduciary responsibilities.
A missing or outdated IPS is also a potential cause of confusion for everyone involved. Advisors might find it hard to justify their investment decisions, while plan participants could be left not understanding the logic behind the funds offered. Inconsistencies could arise when there’s a need to evaluate underperforming funds or decide on their replacements. A well-maintained IPS reviewed regularly can aid in the smooth functioning and credibility of the retirement plan.
3. Not Regularly Reviewing the Share Classes Offered to Allow the Availability of the Lowest-Cost Options
One of the essential aspects of offering a retirement plan is ensuring participants have access to the most cost-effective investment options. Share classes in mutual funds can vary, and each class comes with a unique fee structure. Not all plan sponsors take the time to revisit these share classes periodically, potentially leading to participants shouldering higher fees than necessary. Over time, these added costs can erode the returns and compound to sizable reductions in participants’ savings.
In addition to the monetary implications, there’s also the matter of fiduciary responsibility. Offering the most cost-effective options falls squarely within this duty. Overlooking this critical aspect not only harms participants but also exposes sponsors to potential litigation and reputational risks. Maintaining a watchful eye on share classes keeps participants receiving the best value for their contributions.
Stay Ahead As a Plan Sponsor. Partner With Us.
Leading the way as a plan sponsor comes with its challenges, complexities, and ample room for mistakes. At PlanPILOT, we’re committed to partnering with you, equipping and informing you to make the best decisions for your plan participants.
If you’re determined to stay ahead in your sponsorship role and provide unmatched retirement solutions, let’s collaborate. You can schedule a time for us to meet at (312) 973-4913 or send me an email at mark.olsen@PlanPILOT.com.
About Mark
Mark Olsen is the managing director at PlanPILOT, an independent retirement plan consulting firm headquartered in Chicago. PlanPILOT delivers comprehensive retirement plan advisory services to 401(k), 403(b), and 457 plan sponsors. His specialties include plan governance, investment searches, investment monitoring, and plan oversight. Mark is recognized as a leader in the industry and speaks at national conferences, including those organized by Pensions & Investments, Stable Value Investment Association, and CUPA-HR.