For many plan sponsors, designating an ERISA 3(38) investment manager to manage, select, and monitor the retirement plan’s investments can be beneficial. It allows the plan sponsor to have more time and attention to focus on other aspects of the organization along with managing tasks that are otherwise difficult to outsource. There are many benefits if you decide to hire a 3(38) fiduciary, but it’s important to understand the advantages (and disadvantages) of their role and the questions you should ask when vetting an investment advisor/manager to take on the role for your retirement plan.
Breaking Down 3(21) vs. 3(38) Fiduciary
While most are familiar with the term, many plan sponsors are uncertain of what it actually means to be a fiduciary. In fact, a recent JP Morgan survey stated 43% of company fiduciaries do not identify themselves as fiduciaries. This reflects the fact that many plan sponsors are uncertain about what a fiduciary exactly is.
Hiring a 3(38) Investment Manager
In today’s volatile investing environment, selecting your company’s 401(k) or 403(b) plan investment options on your own can seem like more than a full-time job—not to mention potentially putting your organization at risk of litigation if these investments persistently fall short of their expected returns, have less than competitive fees or can’t be liquidated when employees retire. For many sponsors, shifting the fund selection process to an ERISA 3(38) investment manager can free up time and attention to focus on other aspects of the organization, managing employees, and many tough-to-outsource tasks. We review three key factors for hiring a 3(38) investment manager below.
Understanding the 3(38) Investment Manager
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) sets forth the requirements under which defined contribution plans, such as 401(k)s and 403(b)s, must be managed for the benefit of the plan participants. The catch-word that has been the subject of various lawsuits is fiduciary responsibility. Employers and plan sponsors who have not taken the proper steps to mitigate their liability with respect to the provisions of Section 404(a) of ERISA run the potential for drawn out litigation and the financial risk associated with failing to adhere to the “Prudent Person Rule.” This requirement may cause you to consider whether you wish to continue to assume the role of a Section 3(21) plan fiduciary or outsource investment oversight to a Section 3(38) investment manager.