Oversight of the asset management of institutional asset pools, including foundations, endowments and reserves, is becomingly increasingly complex. The events of 2020 expanded the need to have rock-solid fiduciary governance in place, as boards, committees and finance staff are challenged to re-visit their asset management approach, especially when it is outsourced to an OCIO provider. It is all the more necessary to carefully assess the asset allocation, investment options, expected returns, risk management metrics, the supporting servicing and, of course, fees. Their collective impact on meeting the spending and liquidity
needs of an institution is paramount in assisting an entity to function and fulfill its mission.
OCIO – Whitepaper – Discerning The Role Of Qualitative V. Quantitative Assessments In OCIO Due Diligence And Oversight
There is a significant difference in the approaches of OCIO provider due diligence. The more traditional focus relies heavily, sometimes exclusively, on quantitative measures. Quantitative measures usually focus on returns and fees. While these are important of course, they contain substantial limitations that can impair effective OCIO due diligence and lead to poor outcomes.
4 Steps Plan Sponsors Can Take To Help Improve Retirement Outcomes For Participants
By Mark Olsen, Managing Director at PlanPILOT
Providing an attractive benefits package for your employees is a great way to establish a supportive company culture, retain talented people, and help your employees build financial security for their futures. But plan sponsors take on significant responsibilities when offering retirement plans to employees. These responsibilities include, but are not limited to: